Taş Tepeler

Karahan Tepe · Structure

Structure AB — the rock-cut pillar chamber

Karahan Tepe's signature space: a chamber cut down into the living bedrock, where a cluster of phallus-like pillars rises from the floor and a human head projects from the wall, turned toward whoever descends.

Structure AB — the sunken rock-cut chamber at Karahan Tepe.
Structure AB — the sunken rock-cut chamber at Karahan Tepe.

01

Quick facts

Period
Pre-Pottery Neolithic (roughly 11,000 years ago)
Also called
the “Pillars Shrine” / “Pillar Room” (press usage)
Made by
cutting down into living bedrock (subtractive)
Plan (Karul 2025)
oval, ~7 × 5.3 m, carved ~2.2 m down into bedrock (earlier press figures gave ~7 × 6 m, ~3.5 m)
Entry
a small circular opening and five-step descent; four steps at the opposite N end likely the exit
Posts
ten phallus-shaped posts left standing from the bedrock — four in a row at the front, six at the rear (Karul 2025)
Post heights
front row ~1.83–1.65 m, rear posts ~1.3–1.13 m (Karul 2025)
Carved head
a human head cut into the western wall; a meander line runs off it like a snake's body — a head-with-serpent-body
Channel
a serpentine channel enters from the north, feeding liquid toward a floor pit in Structure AD
Linked to
Structure AD, through a porthole-like opening

02

What is confirmed

Structure AB is a bedrock-cut chamber, an oval about 7 × 5.3 m carved roughly 2.2 m down into the living rock (Karul's 2025 figures; earlier press accounts gave ~7 × 6 m and ~3.5 m) beside the neighbouring Structure AD. Rather than being built up from the ground, its room, pillars and channels were produced by subtraction — the makers carved the space downward and left features standing where they wanted them, so that floor, walls and pillars are one continuous piece of bedrock.

The chamber holds a cluster of tall, rounded, tapering shafts rising straight from the floor — widely described as phallic pillars. Karul's 2025 report counts ten, shaped from the rock left in place as the room was hollowed out (earlier accounts said eleven), the four at the front taller and more elaborately worked. A human head carved high on the western wall — with a protruding forehead, thick lips and a beard under the chin — is turned slightly toward the entrance stairs. A narrow porthole-like opening connects AB to Structure AD, and a serpentine channel enters from the north. Karul reports no domestic material in AB, and records that the chamber was filled in sequential stages — apparently over a short span rather than gradual silting — with large stones deliberately placed over the rear pillars to seal it.

Carved human head emerging from a rock wall next to two rounded pillar tops
The carved head projecting from the bedrock wall, with the tops of two phallic pillars beside it. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Frantisek Trampota, Karahan Tepe human face, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

03

Karul's 2025 report, and a snake

The 2025 excavation chapter sharpens the picture. It gives AB as an oval about 7 × 5.3 m, carved roughly 2.2 m down into the bedrock — shallower than the ~3.5 m of earlier press accounts. It counts ten posts rather than eleven, shaped from the rock mass left in place as the room was hollowed out: four in a line at the front, by the head, and six at the rear. The front row stands taller (about 1.83–1.65 m), the rear posts shorter (about 1.3–1.13 m).

The most striking detail concerns the carved head itself. Karul describes a line running off the head and around toward the edges of the room like the body of a snake — so the wall-image reads as a human head continued by a serpentine body, its forehead marked with a band that may be a hairband, paint or a tattoo. The northern serpentine channel was cut so that liquid poured into it would run down into the chamber and, through the opening in the shared wall, into a pit inside Structure AD. The architecture — posts, head, channel, stairs, and the link to AD — makes AB read as one part of a larger designed whole; what the ceremony was remains the excavator's interpretation.

Sunken rock-cut pit filled with rounded stone pillars, seen from above at dusk
Structure AB seen from above at dusk — the sunken pit of pillars cut into the bedrock, the wider site behind. Photo: karahantepe.net

Taş Tepeler (site owner), Karahan Tepe — karahan site view 02, Owned by the site owner, via .

04

How it was entered

The room was reached by a small circular opening and a five-step descent, and Karul has described AB as having a separate entrance and exit — a second stair to the north-east probably served as the way out, making the space a designed route rather than a single doorway. That arrangement, together with the channel and the watching head, has led the excavator to interpret the chamber as a setting for rites of passage (an interpretation reported in interviews, not a settled conclusion). In talks Karul has gone further, describing liquid moving through the channel toward a pool and the transformation of those who passed through — perhaps an initiation — while stressing that the specific meaning stays interpretation. A further upright carved element, compared to the standing animal figures at other Taş Tepeler sites, is reported to have been set into the floor so as to confront anyone entering — a detail that is reporting-grade and awaits full publication.

05

Why it matters

AB reverses the logic of the better-known enclosures at Göbekli Tepe, where great T-shaped pillars were quarried, moved and raised into built rooms. Here the architecture is negative, defined by what was cut away, which is one reason Karahan Tepe is treated as a distinct achievement rather than a copy of its neighbour. The chamber belongs to the Pre-Pottery Neolithic, on the order of 11,000 years old.

It is worth separating observation from interpretation. That the shafts stand in the bedrock, that a head watches from the wall, and that a channel and staged filling exist are all confirmed. That the pillars were understood specifically as phalluses, what that symbolism meant, and that the room staged rites of passage are interpretations the excavators offer while remaining cautious. A reported winter-solstice light effect in the chamber is a contested popular claim, not peer-reviewed.

06

The names, reconciled

Popular writing calls this room the “Pillars Shrine” or “Pillar Room,” and pairs it with the neighbouring “Great Ellipse” (Structure AD). Those nicknames are useful shorthand, but they come from press and enthusiast coverage rather than from a full excavation report. In the project's own lettering this is Structure AB; where this page uses a nickname it is flagged as such. Karul's 2025 report is now the definitive account, and it uses the AB / AD lettering and its own measured figures — so the press “shrine → ellipse” shorthand is best read as popular labelling layered over the excavator's own.

07

The pillars and the head, up close

No archive photograph of this feature yet.

The phallic pillars in the rock-cut floor

The tall, rounded, tapering shafts — about ten or eleven of them — rise straight from the bedrock floor, not built up but left standing as the room was cut away around them. Their phallic reading is the excavators' interpretation of the form; the shafts themselves are the fact.

Photo: TobeyTravels · Wikimedia Commons

Full page →
No archive photograph of this feature yet.

The head carved from the wall

A human head worked from the living wall, its neck drawn out so the face projects into the chamber and toward the entrance — one of the most arresting single features anywhere in the Taş Tepeler world. Whoever descended into AB was met by its gaze.

Photo: TobeyTravels · Wikimedia Commons

Full page →

08

What was it for?

A setting for rites of passage

Necmi Karul's reading, given in interviews: the designed five-step descent, the separate entrance and exit, the channel carrying liquid toward a pool, and the watching head together suggest a space built to move people through a ceremony — the transformation of participants, possibly an initiation. Karul offers this as interpretation, not a settled conclusion, and prefers the neutral term “special building” to “temple,” which he notes would imply a defined religion the evidence does not demonstrate.

Architecture in the negative

AB reverses Göbekli Tepe's logic. There, great T-pillars were quarried, moved and raised; here the room and its pillars were produced by cutting rock away. That is part of why Karahan Tepe is treated as its own achievement rather than a copy.

What the evidence will not carry

The specific phallic meaning, any story of what the rites involved, and the popular winter-solstice light effect all run ahead of what the chamber can demonstrate. The pillars, head, channel and staged fill are secure; their meaning is open.

09

The finds & carved stones

The objects recorded for this building, gathered as one catalogue. Where a full object page exists, it is linked from the card.

The human head carved from the bedrock wall of Structure AB, watching the room, with the pillars beside it.

Object

The carved human head in Structure AB

A human head projects from the living rock of Structure AB, turned toward the stairs so that it seems to watch everyone who descends into the chamber.

Wikimedia Commons

Full page →

Object

The pillar room of Structure AB

In Structure AB a cluster of tall, phallus-like shafts stands directly out of the carved bedrock floor — pillars that were never set in place, but left standing as the room around them was cut away.

Wikimedia Commons

Full page →

10

Sources

Sources & further reading8 references
  1. Karul, N. (2025). Karahantepe. The Neolithic in Türkiye: Archaeology and Art Publications, Istanbul: 199–238.
  2. Karul, N. (2021). Buried Buildings at Pre-Pottery Neolithic Karahantepe. Türk Arkeoloji ve Etnografya Dergisi 82: 19–29. link
  3. Şanlıurfa Neolithic Research Project — Taş Tepeler (2026). Official project site (Istanbul University / Şanlıurfa Museum). tastepeler.org link
  4. Archaeology Magazine (Archaeological Institute of America) (2021). Prehistoric phallus-shaped pillars found in Turkey. Archaeology Magazine, 22 October 2021. Coverage of the bedrock pillars and carved head in Karahan Tepe's Structure AB. link
  5. The Art Newspaper (2021). Discovery of Turkish 11,400-year-old village challenges ideas of when and why humans first settled down. The Art Newspaper, 17 November 2021. Interview coverage of Karahan Tepe citing Necmi Karul on Structure AB. link
  6. Ancient Origins (2024). Karahan Tepe's remarkable underworld encounters. Ancient Origins. Popular coverage of the bedrock carved head in Structure AB; a reported winter-solstice light effect is cited here as a contested claim, not peer-reviewed. link
  7. Karul, N. (2025). Public lectures and interviews on Karahantepe and the Taş Tepeler project. Transcribed talks and interviews held in the Taş Tepeler research atlas. Spoken material rather than a peer-reviewed publication; positions may be refined in print.
  8. Clare, L. (2020). Göbekli Tepe, Turkey. A brief summary of research at a new World Heritage Site (2015–2019). e-Forschungsberichte des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 2020(2): 81–88.

Full bibliography: the Taş Tepeler reference library →

Explore Karahan Tepe

Last reviewed 11 October 2026. Something wrong?