Taş Tepeler

Taş Tepeler / Göbekli Tepe / Pillar 33 — cranes, snakes and a fox

Object · Carved limestone pillar · Göbekli Tepe

Pillar 33 — cranes, snakes and a fox

A wall pillar of Enclosure D whose two broad faces answer each other: tall cranes and a great bundle of snakes on one side, a leaping fox with an equal bundle of snakes on the other, the serpents pouring over the front where their heads meet.

Göbekli Tepe — the enclosures under their shelter. (Site view; not a photograph of this find.)

Rolf Cosar, Göbekli Tepe - 100525, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Göbekli Tepe — the enclosures under their shelter. (Site view; not a photograph of this find.) — Wikimedia Commons

What's carved on it

Pillar 33 is one of the wall pillars of Enclosure D, the largest and best-preserved of Göbekli Tepe's circular buildings. Its surface is more weathered than some of its neighbours, but the composition is still legible, and it is unusual because the two broad sides are carved as a matched pair.

One broad side carries tall cranes, along with duck-like water birds, angular H-shaped signs, and a large bundle of snakes. The opposite broad side shows a fox together with a comparable mass of snakes. In both cases the snakes appear to issue from the animals' bodies — surging from the fox's torso and from the region of the birds' legs — and both bundles then turn the corner onto the front of the pillar, where the snakes' heads come together at the sides.

Birds with strangely human legs

The cranes on Pillar 33 belong to a small, much-discussed group of Göbekli Tepe birds whose legs read as oddly human — knees and stance closer to a standing person than to a wading bird. The same peculiarity appears on Pillar 2 in Enclosure A, which lets the two be compared rather than treated as a single oddity. Peters and Schmidt, cataloguing the animals, noted that cranes were among the birds the carvers singled out, and that these were plainly not straightforward portraits of wildlife.

That is about as far as the evidence safely reaches. Snakes streaming from a fox's belly and cranes standing on human-like legs are clearly not naturalistic; they belong to a symbolic world whose rules we do not know. Some writers have pushed further — reading the snakes as meteors and the panel as an astronomical scene — but those readings sit well outside the archaeological mainstream and rest on assumptions the excavators reject.

Where it stands, and how old it is

Enclosure D belongs to Göbekli Tepe's earliest, Pre-Pottery Neolithic A phase, built in the centuries around 9500 BCE and radiocarbon-dated in known stratigraphic positions — making Pillar 33 and its carvings roughly eleven thousand years old. The pillar remains set in the ring of the enclosure, a few places around from the famous Vulture Stone (Pillar 43), part of the same crowded, death-and-danger imagery that fills this building. Read together, the pillars of Enclosure D show a single visual language repeated and varied around one great room.

Sources & further reading4 references
  1. Peters, J. & Schmidt, K. (2004). Animals in the symbolic world of Pre-Pottery Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, south-eastern Turkey: a preliminary assessment. Anthropozoologica 39(1): 179–218.
  2. Schmidt, K. (2012). Göbekli Tepe: A Stone Age Sanctuary in South-Eastern Anatolia. Berlin: ex oriente. The foundational monograph by the site's first excavator.
  3. Notroff, J., Dietrich, O. & Schmidt, K. (2014). Building Monuments, Creating Communities. Early monumental architecture at Pre-Pottery Neolithic Göbekli Tepe. In J.F. Osborne (ed.), Approaching Monumentality in Archaeology: 83–105. Albany: SUNY Press.
  4. The Tepe Telegrams (official research blog of the Göbekli Tepe Project, DAI). The Tepe Telegrams. Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. link Accessible, authoritative running commentary from the excavation team.

Full bibliography: the Taş Tepeler reference library →

See it for yourself

We run small-group and private tours across the Taş Tepeler landscape.

Plan a visit →

Last reviewed 17 August 2026. Something wrong?