Taş Tepeler

Taş Tepeler / Göbekli Tepe / Pillar 2

Discovery · Göbekli Tepe

Pillar 2

Pillar 2 is a Enclosure A pillar at Göbekli Tepe with bull/aurochs, fox, crane, and bucranium imagery, plus a crucial source caution that it may be in a secondary position. Pillar 2 matters because it gives us another Göbekli example of crane imagery with strangely human-like legs, letting us compare it against Pillar 33 instead of treating the crane problem as a one-off oddity.

Site: Göbekli TepeStructure: Enclosure AType: Pillar
Pillar 2 in Enclosure A at Göbekli Tepe, carved with reliefs of an aurochs, a fox and a crane.

Pillar 2 in Enclosure A at Göbekli Tepe, carved with reliefs of an aurochs, a fox and a crane.

German Archaeological Institute, Göbekli Tepe Project, Pillar 2, Enclosure A, Göbekli Tepe, Copyright: DAI — used with permission, via Wikimedia Commons.

What's actually there

Pillar 2 is assigned to Enclosure A; Enclosure A canonical parent remains to be built. Pillar 2 is described as one of the two central pillars of Enclosure A. Pillar 2 is described with a right-side vertical sequence of bull, fox, and crane motifs.

What to notice

Pillar 2 is a Enclosure A pillar at Göbekli Tepe with bull/aurochs, fox, crane, and bucranium imagery, plus a crucial source caution that it may be in a secondary position. Pillar 2 matters because it gives us another Göbekli example of crane imagery with strangely human-like legs, letting us compare it against Pillar 33 instead of treating the crane problem as a one-off oddity. Pillar 2 is assigned to Enclosure A; Enclosure A canonical parent remains to be built. Pillar 2 is described as one of the two central pillars of Enclosure A. Pillar 2 is described with a right-side vertical sequence of bull, fox, and crane motifs. A Tepe Telegrams/DAI caption describes Pillar 2 reliefs as aurochs, fox, and crane. Evidence

What's carved on it

See it for yourself

We run small-group and private tours across the Taş Tepeler landscape.

Plan a visit →

Last reviewed 21 July 2026. Something wrong?