Taş Tepeler

Sefertepe · Structure

Small finds and symbolic objects

Beads are the most common find at Sefertepe, and the site's small finds — a double-faced bead, carved figurines, worked stone and tools — carry much of its symbolic evidence, reported from the field ahead of full publication.

The mound of Sefer Tepe on the Viranşehir plain. (Site view; not a photograph of this find.)
The mound of Sefer Tepe on the Viranşehir plain. (Site view; not a photograph of this find.) Wikimedia Commons

Frantisek Trampota, Sefer Tepe, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

01

Quick facts

Nature
a site-level assemblage of portable finds, not a single building
Commonest find
beads — recovered from the first season onward
Bead materials
jade, serpentine, limestone, igneous labradorite and bone
Standout 2025
a double-faced bead a few centimetres across, a human face on each side
Bead forms
disc/round, micro-disc, quadrilateral and drop-shaped — plus a bead carved as an animal head (a toad)
A local type
some forms match a distinct 'Sefertepe type'; others repeat forms seen at neighbouring settlements
Figural finds
a leopard and a vulture-with-human jade ornament (2024)
Worked stone
a juvenile wild-boar image on a grinding stone; a limestone object with thirteen circles on each face
Wider kit
lithic, ground-stone and bone tools
Status
reported from the 2024–2025 seasons; findspots and catalogue detail mostly unpublished

02

A site-level assemblage

This entry groups Sefertepe's portable finds rather than a single building. Until exact findspots, catalogue numbers and figure-level detail are published, the objects are best read together as a site-level assemblage. Almost all of it is reported from the 2024–2025 seasons — announced at project briefings and in interviews with excavation director Emre Güldoğan — rather than set out in a peer-reviewed report.

Dozens of small stone beads, rings and worked-stone objects of varied colours arranged on a dark background
Sefertepe's small finds laid out together — beads, ring-shaped pieces and worked stone objects in greenstone, jade, serpentine, limestone and bone. Beads are the site's commonest symbolic find. Photo: Sefertepe excavations

03

Beads and the double-faced bead

Beads are the dominant symbolic small-find group at Sefertepe, and they vary widely in both raw material and form. The main materials are jade, serpentine, limestone, igneous labradorite and bone; the forms include disc/round, micro-disc, quadrilateral and drop-shaped beads, along with a specimen carved in the shape of an animal head (a toad). Some of these match a distinct 'Sefertepe type', while others repeat forms found at neighbouring settlements — a mix of local character and shared regional fashion.

The standout of the 2025 season is a tiny double-faced bead, only a few centimetres across, carved with a human face on each side — micro-carving that is rare for the early Neolithic; reporting describes the material as a dark stone (variously given as black basalt or serpentinite). Because jade and labradorite are not local, the excavators read the bead materials as evidence that Sefertepe was tied into wider exchange networks — a reasonable inference that provenance study would need to confirm.

A typological plate of Sefertepe beads and pendants sorted into rows by shape and size
The range of Sefertepe bead and pendant forms, arranged by type — grooved and pierced pieces, tubular beads, spherical beads and micro-beads. Photo: Sefertepe excavations

04

Figurines, worked stone and tools

The reported assemblage also includes a leopard figurine and, from earlier reporting, jade ornaments described as a leopard and a vulture-with-human-figure; a juvenile wild-boar image on a heavily used grinding stone; and a worked limestone object bearing thirteen circles on each face, whose purpose is unknown. Lithic, ground-stone and bone tools round out the everyday-work material. Findspots and catalogue metadata for several of these objects remain open, and some may be superseded by the excavation's own figures.

Five views of a small green stone bead carved as an animal (toad) head, with a centimetre scale bar
A bead carved in the shape of an animal head (a toad), shown from several sides with a 5 cm scale — one of the distinctive 'Sefertepe type' forms. Photo: Sefertepe excavations

05

What was it for?

Symbolism at every scale

Güldoğan's team present the small finds as evidence that Sefertepe's symbolic concerns ran across every scale of material culture — from carved blocks and pillars down to objects a person could wear or carry. That is a reading offered from the field, consistent with the finds rather than proven by them.

Plugged into wider networks

Because jade and labradorite do not occur locally, the excavators read the bead materials as signs that Sefertepe was tied into long-distance exchange or procurement. A reasonable inference that raw-material provenance study would need to confirm.

06

The finds & carved stones

The objects recorded for this building, gathered as one catalogue. Where a full object page exists, it is linked from the card.

The double-faced bead from Sefertepe — a small basalt bead carved with a human face on each side.

Sefertepe excavations, Double-faced bead from Sefertepe, Sefertepe excavations, via .

Object

The Double-Faced Bead from Sefertepe

A pebble-sized bead only a few centimetres across, carved with a human face on each of its two sides — micro-work that is rare for the early Neolithic Near East.

Sefertepe excavations

Full page →
No archive photograph of this object yet — see the full page.

Object

Juvenile Boar Grinding Stone

Full page →
No archive photograph of this object yet — see the full page.

Object

The Leopard Bead from Sefertepe

A small jade ornament in the form of a leopard — one of a pair of animal beads whose stone came from far outside the region, and whose imagery links Sefertepe to Göbekli Tepe and Karahan Tepe.

Full page →
No archive photograph of this object yet — see the full page.

Object

Worked Limestone 13 Circles

Full page →

07

Sources

Sources & further reading9 references
  1. Karul, N., Baird, D., Clare, L., Erdalkıran, M., Güldoğan, E., Miyake, Y., Özdoğan, E., Shimogama, K., Şahin, F. & Uludağ, C. (2025). Şanlıurfa Neolitik Çağ Araştırmaları Projesi — Taş Tepeler: Son Çalışmalar, Yeni Sonuçlar (Sefertepe section). Taş Tepeler project volume, Sefertepe section. The most detailed published account of Sefertepe's architecture, pillars and finds to date.
  2. Şanlıurfa Neolithic Research Project — Taş Tepeler (2026). Official project site (Istanbul University / Şanlıurfa Museum). tastepeler.org link
  3. Erdoğan, K. (2025). 8,500-year-old carved faces, tiny double-faced bead reshape Sefertepe's role in Taş Tepeler. Türkiye Today, 28 November 2025. Field reporting; awaiting full publication. link
  4. Altuntaş, L. (2025). An 8,500-year-old micro-carved bead and a 10,000-year-old skull room reveal Sefertepe's symbolic world. Arkeonews, 30 November 2025. link
  5. Kayra, O. (2025). A stunning Taş Tepeler discovery: human faces emerge from Sefertepe. Arkeonews, 26 November 2025. Field reporting; describes the double-sided bead as black serpentinite. link
  6. Daily Sabah (with Anadolu Agency) (2024). Türkiye's Sefertepe excavations reveal ancient vulture ornaments. Daily Sabah, 29 September 2024. Two jade ornaments — a leopard and a vulture with a human figure. Awaiting full publication. link
  7. Erdoğan, K. (2024). Ancient jewelry discovered dating back 10,000 years in Türkiye's Sefertepe. Türkiye Today, 30 September 2024. Field reporting; awaiting full publication. link
  8. Çelik, B. (2006). Sefer Tepe: A New Pre-Pottery Neolithic Site in Southeastern Turkey. Neo-Lithics 1/06: 23–25.
  9. Onsite notes from archaeologists working at Sefertepe (2024). Field observations recorded at the site, end of August 2024. Unpublished field notes held by Taş Tepeler (tastepeler.net). First-hand site notes, not a peer-reviewed publication. Figures may be superseded by the excavation's own reporting.

Full bibliography: the Taş Tepeler reference library →

Explore Sefertepe

Last reviewed 7 October 2026. Something wrong?